Normalizing Referee Ratings

Normalizing Referee Ratings

Normalizing Referee Ratings

EVLA & VLBA

Initially, the EVLA and VLBA referees use a scale of 0.0 through 9.9, with lower numbers (e.g., 1.0) being better than higher numbers (e.g., 9.0).

Then, for each referee, we assign a normalized rating of 0.0 to the best-rated proposal and 4.0 to the worst-rated proposal, and distribute the rest of that referee's proposals evenly between normalized ratings of 0.0 and 4.0. This linear-ramp method ensures that each referee's normalized median rating is 2.0, and places all referees and all referee categories on an equivalent scale. Each proposal is then assigned a mean normalized rating that is the average of the normalized ratings from the referees who evaluated the proposal. For each proposal, the Proposal Selection Committee takes consistency of the normalized ratings into account fairly strongly, not just looking at the mean normalized rating, which may be influenced by a single referee giving a much higher or lower normalized rating than all the other referees.

In their referees' reports, the proposers do not receive any normalized ratings, but do receive the rating assigned by each referee, as well as a notation of the median rating assigned by that referee.

Connect with NRAO

The NSF National Radio Astronomy Observatory and NSF Green Bank Observatory are facilities of the U.S. National Science Foundation operated under cooperative agreement by Associated Universities, Inc.